Organisation |
Date |
Q1) In your opinion on a scale of 1-10 (1 being no problem) how big a problem is spitting within the borough? |
Q2) What are the reasons for your answer to Q1? |
Q3)
Does your answer to Q1 differ when considering different locations within the
borough and if so why? |
Q4) What data do you have on spitting related incidents? |
Q5) What part do you see your organisation playing in relation to the process and enforcement of a spitting by-law? |
SYP |
20/2/12 |
1 |
Consulted with my staff and own knowledge of lack of complaints |
No |
None as there isn’t any incidents |
Very difficult to enforce but should be jointly enforced if possible |
DMBC Public Health |
21/2/12 |
3 |
It appears to be a small problem in Doncaster nonetheless
it is still an issue that is seen to effect
residents and visitors of |
I would perceive that |
None, however working within an enforcement team we face many incidents of littering and issue fpn to people who litter. |
It would fall within our remit very efficiently as we issue fpn’s and prosecute for fly tipping, littering etc. |
DMBC Communities team central |
21/2/12 |
2 |
Residents have never raised this as an issue but I am aware small pockets of younger people do do it. |
No |
Scanned our complaints system and there are none |
Identification of people who spit and enforce via the existing blue book system. |
SLHD East/South |
21/2/12 |
8 / 10 |
It is a big issue in that it happens a lot, however, only scored 8 rather than 10 due it not being as anti social incident as fighting, swearing, verbal abuse etc |
Yes – spitting is much more frequent where gangs of youths
congregate and is more of an issue where high incidences of fly tipping, anti
social behaviour etc. – also an issue around school gates and school runs
near comprehensive schools |
None |
Need to get our powers on dog fouling and littering sorted
first – on spot fines etc. then we could have delegated powers in the same
way |
SLHD Central |
21/2/12 |
Between 8-9 in certain areas whilst
other areas 6 |
Town Centre are
high around |
Yes more people living with the area of Town Centre |
No record |
Observation
and assisting DMBC in reporting. |
SLHD North |
21.2.12 |
5/6 |
All officers have
different views and there is a difference in how big the problem is with each
officer |
Yes - the main areas of concerns in all officer's opinions is the town centre (shopping area). In all areas the areas of concerns and mainly witnessed are playing fields and parks and especially football fields |
None other than if
a tenant specifically reports this as a breach of tenancy |
Not sure but we would
normally feed intelligence into DMBC and the Police |
DMBC private Sector Housing |
22/2/12 |
8 |
Office located in Central area (East Laith Gate) therefore high footfall locally could account for high scoring as opposed to a possible lower scoring for a residential area. |
See answer to question 2 |
No data kept. Response is anecdotal. |
None as we are involved with private rented housing (and therefore, tenancy related ASB rather than general ASB). |
Enforcement Team (Regeneration and Environment) |
22.02.12 |
2 |
We have had no complaints or public reaction to this issue |
No |
None |
If a byelaw were to be introduced our Enforcement Officers could enforce this along with street littering duties. However I feel the offence would not be easy to enforce |
DMBC Area Manager – NORTH |
27.2.2012 |
3 |
As an active SNT, spitting is not an issue that has been reported to the team or SNT members requiring or requesting action. |
Yes. I perceive that spitting may be more of a noticeable issue in town centres across the borough due to the numbers of daytime people and visitors in these locations. |
None |
The area teams would probably be required to undertake this as part of their enforcement duties. |
South Area Team |
27/02/2012 |
1 |
Having discussed with other members of staff who work and live in different locations within the borough. It was collectively agreed that no one has ever identified an issue. |
It may be more relevant within the Town Centre due to the high footfall, but individually although all agreed it is a disgusting habit, it is not something that is witnessed very often. |
None, again I discussed with team and am not aware of any Data relating to this. I have also interrogated the systems used for recording such data. |
It would be difficult to enforce but an educational role could be adopted by the Area Teams |
Communities |
27/02/12 |
2 |
Only one incident reported (CC Online) since 2005. Not aware of any other concerns raised by residents or staff |
Yes – High public footfall areas such as town centres, bus stops, play areas |
One incident found on CC Online, which was recorded in 2005 |
* Education * Publicise awareness of By-Law and Enforcement Action implications * Enforcement (if appropriate) * Delivery of reparation activities |
SYFR |
29.02,.2012 |
1 |
We have no recorded incidents and when discussing the issue no one saw it as an issue. |
No |
None |
There is CCTV on all fire appliances that could possibly be used as evidence. |